The Moment of Truth for Sales

The moment of truth arrives when a prospect is engaged in a meaningful interaction with your organization.

For B2B marketers that key point is the response generated from a marketing effort through direct, online or social media marketing.

For sales, it is the sales conversation: that defining moment when a prospect is engaged, qualified and profiled through a dynamic dialog.

The sales conversation is being shaped by a number of strong forces:

  1. Buyers increasingly prefer online and telephone discussions rather than face-to-face discussions.  By necessity or due to communications and online research preferences, buyers have moved away from face-to-face meetings.   For more on this, read the post: Selling to the Digital Buyer.
  2. Buyers don’t find value in sales discussions.   Surveys of buyers identify a crisis in the sales conversation:  McKinsey found that the two most destructive sales behaviors were inadequate product knowledge and excessive customer contact. In IDC‘s 2010 IT Customer Experience study, over 50% of IT sales reps are showing up to their prospect and customer meetings ‘unprepared’.   Forrester Research reports that only 15% of executives believe that sales meetings live up to expectations.
  3. New offerings lower buyer risk and the need for face-to-face meetings.     Buyers can take lengthy free trials and upgrade to a fully functional solution later (i.e. the freemium model).    Products can be purchased is small quantities (i.e. online data) or rent, rather than buy, a solution that is hosted off-premise (i.e. SaaS, hosted solutions).
  4. The weak economic outlook is causing organizations to economize on sales models.    Creating less resource intensive selling models is a priortiy for many organizations.

The nature of the sales conversation changes depending on the type of sales: inside sales, outside/field sales and hybrid sales – a combination of both inside and outside sales.

One of the largest beneficiaries of changing nature of the sales conversation is the inside sales function.   

CSO Insights,  a B2B sales researcher, recently released their 2010 Telemarketing Inside Sales Optimization survey

According to Barry Trailer, Managing Partner for CSO Insights.

There’s a great deal happening in Inside Sales and it’s all very exciting.  The adoption of enabling technology, higher percentage of leads being generated by marketing, and anticipated growth in telesales teams this year all suggest this is going to be an increasingly important segment of companies’ overall revenue mix.

The research indicates that one in seven firms plans to increase telemarketing/inside sales reps by more than 20%.

Last year, in a brief entitled ‘The Rapid Rise of Inside Sales’, SiriusDecisions, a provider of B2B research and advisory services in sales and marketing, is bullish on the prospects for inside sales predicting a doubling of the revenue contribution of inside sales to overall corporate revenue.

For buying models that require face-to-face interaction, the opportunity is not to eliminate face-to-face but  judiciously mix telephone and online dialog with face-to-face meetings as the buying cycle dictates.

Stuart Armstong, in a comment on my earlier blog post, pointed out some research from Forbes Insight indicates that the majority of business owners and CXO level executives prefer face-to-face meetings (albeit that the research brief is slanted to appeal to the hotel industry and seems to fly in the face of the analyst research listed above).  One of the conclusions by Forbes Insight drawn from the research is that:

Web-, video- and teleconferencing have their role, but the executives in the survey do not expect them to make the need for face-to-face meetings obsolete. Rather, many see the ideal as a mix of face-to-face and technology enabled meetings and conferences.

Question:  How do you perceive sales models and the sales conversation changing?    
 

Related Posts
Selling to the Digital B2B Buyer
Destructive B2B Sales Practices
Insights on the Outbound Renaissance

Photo Credit

Posted in B2B marketing, Sales 2.0, SiriusDecisions, buyer behavior, inside sales, lead generation, telesales Tagged , , , , , , , , , |

Selling to the Digital B2B Buyer

The digital world is bringing great change to how buyers wish to interact with B2B sales teams.  

Buyers who are at ease in researching, communicating, collaborating and buying on the internet are choosing to do business differently.  

And I am not referring to the ‘Lost Generation’: those dying breed of executives who ask their executive assistants to print out their emails.  

In a recent blog post, Steve Woods notes that:   

As the emphasis on face-to-face interaction as a way to build trust decreases in lieu of other ways of building trust, the need to be “in the field” also decreases.  

With the recession, corporations are pressured to cut sales costs.  Steve Woods cites a stellar blog post from David Skok that compares the relative efficiency of different B2B selling models.  

But if B2B sales teams reduce the amount of face-to-face selling time in favor of more efficient sales models using the web and telephone, will B2B buyers be receptive?  

In fact, B2B buyers have been driving this change for some time and the pace is accelerating:  

  1. The buying process starts online and so do sales meetings -  Given that most buying is initiated with online search, buyers are naturally becoming more accepting of interactions with sales via web conference, email and online chat.   These buyers expect a fast response from an informed sales rep and will not wait for the time it takes to schedule an in-person meeting.
  2. The digital buyer prefers data to voice -   The social B2B buyer is more than likely on Facebook at home and at work,  on email and LinkedIn.  The buyer favors producing content that  is written (data) and not spoken (voice).  This week Facebook announced that  it has reached 500 million users. LinkedIn has over 70 million members worldwide.  Not only is this communication data-driven but it is now mostly mobile: mobile data eclipsed voice traffic in December 2009.
  3. The buyer is not at the office – How you can you meet face-to-face when your prospect is not at the office?    The B2B buyer’s office is often in motion (e.g. plane, trains & automobiles) or a home office.    The door to your customer is opened through their mobile device and not a fixed position PC.
  4. The buyer is time-starved – Buyers face inordinate demands on their time.  Meeting face-to-face is becoming less frequent due to jam-packed schedules.   The Corporate Leadership Councial found that the “average ‘job footprint’ (what a worker is expected to do) has increased by a third since the beginning of the recession” (see the Economist for more details).   In  the new book “Snap Selling“, Jill Konrath diagnoses the buyer as suffering from:    Frazzled Customer Syndrome, a debilitating condition brought on by excessive workloads, 24/7 availability, information overload, lack of sleep, and job-related stress.
  5. The World (of Buyers) is Flat – Evaluation teams are dispersed across the country and even around the world.     Meeting face-to-face with all team members is not a possibility given the dispersed nature of buying teams.

Do you sense that buyers are less reluctant to meet in-person?   What are you seeing out there in the market? 

Related Posts By Robert Lesser 
Destructive B2B Sales Practices 
The Buyer is Alway’s Right. (Not!) 
Use Outbound Marketing to Target these 5 Buyer Types

Posted in Sales 2.0, buyer behavior, inside sales, outbound marketing, sales enablement, telesales Tagged , , , , |

Savvy Buying of B2B Data

An Interview with Ruth P. Stevens and Bernice Grossman

I am pleased to welcome Ruth P.  Stevens and Bernice Grossman, two well recognized B2B direct marketing experts.    Ruth P. Stevens consults on customer acquisition and retention, teaches marketing at Columbia Business School and blogs at HBR.org. 

Bernice Grossman created DMRS Group an independent marketing database consultancy.

Ruth & Bernice…thanks for joining me today.    The B2B community has found a lot of value in the research that your organizations have conducted in database marketing.

Over the years,  we have seen a large shift in the way that B2B sales and marketing folks buy data.

How has the buying of data by B2B organizations changed ?

Bernice (BG):      B2B organizations used to only rely on telephone marketing, space advertising or direct mail.  Now email and social media have been added to the mix.  Previously data buys were concentrated from two sources – controlled circulation magazines and compiled sources.  Now B2B marketers have access to Co-op’s – where response and transaction-type data are also available.  B2B buying of data has finally caught up to the buying of consumer data!

One of the more exciting opportunities to come along for B2B are the on-line and user generated data sources like Jigsaw, NetProspex, ZoomInfo  and others.  The user generated, i.e, where the user is incented to provide contact information “in trade” for like information as well as on-line sources where the web is scraped and info from various URL’s is captured.  Finally, sources that are close to up-to-date!  This is information that has always eluded the B2B marketer. Compiled files and even controlled circulation files were out-of-date by the time they got to the marketer – especially the user generated data is a real find. 

B2B organizations need to be proactive in planning their data purchases yet data buying is often a last minute tactic.    Online data provides instant gratification and in some ways creates more issues.  What is your perspective?

Ruth (RPS): You are making a good point.  It’s tragic.   But the fact that data is more accessible can’t really be blamed.  It’s uninformed (or misguided) marketers who are the problem.  We all know that good targeting drives at least 50% of results in lead generation, but some marketers get so caught up in the other stuff –the offer and the copy/design– that they simply neglect the data.  Let’s hope they are reading your blog and getting some inspiration to adjust their priorities. 

What are the biggest data pitfalls that B2B organizations face in buying data?   How can these be addressed?

BG:  The biggest pitfalls are several:

  1. accuracy is difficult to judge up-front
  2. in-depth coverage of any vertical with complete firmographic detail is still lacking
  3. learning the truth about the source of some B2B data files is still difficult

The only way I address these issues is through testing the data and asking lots of questions about the source / ownership of the data – and test results and the answers have to “pass muster” – if not, I don’t use the data.

What is the best way to buy data?

RPS: To test a variety of vendors.  For cold prospecting, order a statistically projectable sample for your campaign.  For data append, take a sample of your file and send it to several vendors to assess match rate and accuracy. 

What steps would you recommend a client take to appending data?     What are the leading B2B suppliers in this area?

RPS: The granddaddies are D&B and InfoGroup.  But Jigsaw is coming up rapidly as an exciting new data source, and one that is especially strong in the area of individual contacts.

There are a lot of data houses that offer data appending services.    How do you recommend working with those that provide these services?  

We have produced a white paper on this subject (click here this free white paper)

Appending services should be tested.  If the marketer wants to append to their existing file from a data house I suggest sending an identical test file to all of the vendors and asking them to do the append and send back the data – promising not to use the test data for anything other than testing.  Then compare the hit rate, match rate and coverage rate to determine who to use.  It is not a question of the data housed at the append service it is a question of how well they can match the marketer’s data to their’s and what that hit, match and coverage rate is.

What is your perspective on buying lists and data quality?

RPS: When you consider that B2B data degrades at the rate of 4% to 6% a month, everyone’s file is at risk.  But in our recent study we found that the data available from compilers was surprisingly accurate.  The problem, in fact, was coverage.  Most of the vendors were missing records on important individual contacts. 

My perspective is test, test, test.  If the source that you want to use does not have sufficient data that will match to your file for append, cleanse and/or add – then let the buyer beware.  I believe it is incumbent on the marketer – the buyer of these services to be able to discern data quality – only testing will create an informed buyer.

Do you expect that B2B marketers will continue to use online data sources Jigsaw or NetProspex in the same way for list creation?

BG: Yes, they already are.  Some B2B marketers are fully subscribing to Jigsaw and/or NetProspex and are developing “look alike” prospect files for list creation.  In addition to using these sources to expand their contacts and the information about their contacts, most specifically email and soon cell phone information, the subscription sources are becoming good list creation sources as well.

Do you have any advice on how resources should be allocated on improving a house file vs. buying lists

RPS: Resources for house files should be allocated for making sure that complete and total information is contained, managed and updated.  Resources should also be allocated to the house file side for the software to access, manipulate, query, select, export, import and analyze.  The balance of the resources can then be allocated to buying lists, and/or buying data.  I contend that the majority of the resources should be allocated in-house.

Bernice addressed this, and I agree with her.  I would just add that a critically important step that is often neglected in B2B is “data discovery,” a process by which marketers identify the data elements they need, and then figure out how to go get them.  Usually first by append, and then filling in the gaps by outbound contact through phone or email to gather the additional points. 

Thanks Ruth and Bernice for your sage advice.       

Resources

Database Marketing Whitepapers

Online Data is Mainstream – Acquiring Minds Blog Post

Comparing B2B Online Data Sources – New Research – Acquiring Minds Blog Post

Photo Credit

Posted in B2B marketing, database marketing, lead generation Tagged , , , , , , |